A randomized study compared the effectiveness of two

Last updated: 3/5/2023

A randomized study compared the effectiveness of two different flea collars for dogs The dogs in the treatment group using Flea Collar A had a mean of 2 8 fleas The dogs in the treatment group using Flea Collar B had a mean of 3 3 fleas To determine if the results are significant the data are rerandomized and the differences of the means are shown in the dot plot What is the best conclusion to make based on the data The difference of the means is significant because the rerandomizations show that it is within the range of what could happen by chance The difference of the means is not significant because the rerandomizations show that it is outside the range of what could happen by chance The difference of the means is significant because O the rerandomizations show that it is outside the range of what could happen by chance The difference of the means is not significant because the rerandomizations show that it is within the range of what could happen by chance 2 Difference of Means